>  Posts tagged "family lawyer islamabad" (Page 6)

Waqar and Waqar Law associates Best Law firm Lawyer in IslamabadLegal services in IslamabadBest lawyer in IslamabadBest Lawyer in RawalpindiBest Family Lawyer in IslamabadBest family Lawyer in RawalpindiBest lawyer for child custody caseCompany registration servicesBest civil lawyer in IslamabadBest civil lawyer in RawalpindiBest criminal lawyer in IslamabadBest criminal lawyer in Rawalpindi Best

P L D 1995Supreme Court 34 Present: Mir Hazar Khan Khoso and MuhammadMunir Khan, JJ TARIQ BASHIRand 5 others‑‑‑Petitioners versus THESTATE‑‑‑Respondent CriminalPetition for Leave to Appeal No. 56‑K of 1994, decided on 31st August,1994. (Onappeal from the order of High Court of Sindh at Karachi, dated 5‑7‑1994passed in Criminal Bail No.265/1994 (Kar.) 117/1994 (Hyd.)). (a) Criminal Procedure

Suit for recovery of dowry articles --- Framing of issues --- Scope --- Plea raised belatedly --- Respondent ( wife ) filed a suit for recovery of dowry articles wherein she , inter alia , claimed the return of a vehicle --- Family Court framed a generalized issue regarding the

Waqar and Waqar Law associates Best Law firm Lawyer in IslamabadLegal services in IslamabadBest lawyer in IslamabadBest Lawyer in RawalpindiBest Family Lawyer in IslamabadBest family Lawyer in RawalpindiBest lawyer for child custody caseCompany registration servicesBest civil lawyer in IslamabadBest civil lawyer in RawalpindiBest criminal lawyer in IslamabadBest criminal lawyer in Rawalpindi Best

Waqar and Waqar Law associates Best Law firm Lawyer in IslamabadLegal services in IslamabadBest lawyer in IslamabadBest Lawyer in RawalpindiBest Family Lawyer in IslamabadBest family Lawyer in RawalpindiBest lawyer for child custody caseCompany registration servicesBest civil lawyer in IslamabadBest civil lawyer in RawalpindiBest criminal lawyer in IslamabadBest criminal lawyer in Rawalpindi Best

2022 SCMR 1481Multiple reliefs sought in a suit---Main relief barred by limitation---Effect---When the main relief sought in a suit is barred by time, the consequential relief, even if be within time, is of no legal avail

2018 SCMR 2092 Recording of evidence---Duty of Court----Inadmissible evidence---Trial judge had to check admissibility of evidence without waiting for any such objection from either side because the judge was required to be vigilant and had to play an active role while recording the evidence of witnesses---Trial Court was duty bound to

Medical evidence------It is by now well settled law that medical evidence may confirm, ocular evidence with regard to seat of injuries, nature of injuries, kind of weapon used in occurrence, but it would not connect accused with commission of offence.

Waqar and Waqar Law associates Best Law firm Lawyer in IslamabadLegal services in IslamabadBest lawyer in IslamabadBest Lawyer in RawalpindiBest Family Lawyer in IslamabadBest family Lawyer in RawalpindiBest lawyer for child custody caseCompany registration servicesBest civil lawyer in IslamabadBest civil lawyer in RawalpindiBest criminal lawyer in IslamabadBest criminal lawyer in Rawalpindi Best

× How can I help you?