>  Legal Services (Page 18)

PLD 2022 Lahore 271In the statutes governing our country’s criminal administration of justice, the word “superdari” has not been used. However, it may be defined in its practical prospect as the interim custody of seized property connected with an offence, or suspected to have been stolen or found under circumstances

PLJ 2022 Islamabad 200 Present: Aamer Farooq, J. MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ SHABEER--Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE and others--Respondents W.P. No. 3035 of 2022, decided on 22.8.2022. Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 199--Writ petition--Criminal Procedure Code, (V of 1898), Ss. 435/439 & 167--Request for further remand--Turned down--Criminal revision filed by state, was allowed and petitioner remanded in police custody

PLJ 2022 Islamabad 102 Present: Saman Rafat Imtiaz, J. MUHAMMAD TANVEER AHMAD--Petitioner versus EX-OFFICIO JUSTICE OF PEACE/ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-III, ISLAMABAD-EAST and 3 others--Respondents W.P. No. 440 of 2022, decided on 7.4.2022. Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 22-A--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199--Petition for registration of case--Dismissed--Pendency of civil case for recovery of maintenance allowance--Submission

PLJ 2022 Islamabad 72 Present: Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, J. Ms. KINZA ANWAR Office Assistant HR, (NEPRA)--Petitioner versus OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN FOR PROTECTION AGAINST HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT THE WORK PLACE through Registrar Islamabad and 3 others--Respondents W.P. No. 912 of 2021, decided on 5.4.2022. Protection Against Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2010 (IV of

Waqar and Waqar Law associates Best Law firm Lawyer in IslamabadLegal services in IslamabadBest lawyer in IslamabadBest Lawyer in RawalpindiBest Family Lawyer in IslamabadBest family Lawyer in RawalpindiBest lawyer for child custody caseCompany registration servicesBest civil lawyer in IslamabadBest civil lawyer in RawalpindiBest criminal lawyer in IslamabadBest criminal lawyer in Rawalpindi Best

2022 MLD 1378 Specific Relief Act ( I of 1877 ) --- --- S.12 - Suit for specific performance --- Non - payment of balance sale consideration --- Effect --- Respondents filed suit for specific performance of agreement to sell against vendors alleging therein that they had settled the sale with

Waqar and Waqar Law associates Best Law firm Lawyer in IslamabadLegal services in IslamabadBest lawyer in IslamabadBest Lawyer in RawalpindiBest Family Lawyer in IslamabadBest family Lawyer in RawalpindiBest lawyer for child custody caseCompany registration servicesBest civil lawyer in IslamabadBest civil lawyer in RawalpindiBest criminal lawyer in IslamabadBest criminal lawyer in Rawalpindi Best

P L D 1995Supreme Court 34 Present: Mir Hazar Khan Khoso and MuhammadMunir Khan, JJ TARIQ BASHIRand 5 others‑‑‑Petitioners versus THESTATE‑‑‑Respondent CriminalPetition for Leave to Appeal No. 56‑K of 1994, decided on 31st August,1994. (Onappeal from the order of High Court of Sindh at Karachi, dated 5‑7‑1994passed in Criminal Bail No.265/1994 (Kar.) 117/1994 (Hyd.)). (a) Criminal Procedure

Suit for recovery of dowry articles --- Framing of issues --- Scope --- Plea raised belatedly --- Respondent ( wife ) filed a suit for recovery of dowry articles wherein she , inter alia , claimed the return of a vehicle --- Family Court framed a generalized issue regarding the

× How can I help you?